Armor vs. Energy

[Xtowers]

Hello there fellow clan members. Just a quick question. I'm currently level 19 and I'm at the point where I have max range and I need to spend points on keeping me alive, rather than killing others. I have decided to put at least one point of three into move speed, and then for the other two into either armor or energy, but I can't decide which. I don't know which is better. I think if I can't decide, I may as well put one into each, but what do you think?

[Tormentedsaw]

armor, its takes more hits to destory a point of armor than health (i have tested it)

[nimby]

Armor, hands down. Especially if you play golem rather than death match, as Torm said it takes more hits to lower your armor than your health, plus it reduces the amount of health that is lowered with each hit.

[LinDizzle]

Armor is better than energy, but instead of only 1 point into move speed.. I recommend you put 2 into move speed and 1 into armor. However, if you buy a Lac Crown then you can continue with your original plan of placing 1 stat into move speed.

[Xtowers]

Okay, armor it is then, but I will put two into move speed and one into armor each level. Would you also recommend that I max out my move speed before maxing out armor?

[FlameSpike]

oh man. armor all the way. my mage is pure specced armor and energy, and I gotta tell you, the armor definitely helps more. tho of course both are nice for pissing off warriors wondering why I don't die

[LinDizzle]

For archers, I would say most max out range first and then max out move speed immediately after.. there are alot of "archer killers" so more speed would help out alot. Armor does help.. but it takes a couple points into armor to make up for each hit that you take from a warrior/bs. Then you come up against those that have max basic attack.. then armor does not help much at all.

[monkeymagic]

Do Armor after you max out Range and Movement Speed. You need speed more trust me.